View current policy. Background: One of the new provisions added to the RAA requires ICANN to develop in consultation with registrars a webpage that identifies available registrant rights and responsibilities. This published document is the result of initial input from a joint working group of the GNSO Council and the At-Large Advisory Committee and subsequent consultations with the registrars; and provides a "plain language" summary of registrant rights and responsibilities that currently exist under the RAA. This document provides some "plain language" summarization of terms related to Registrant Rights and Responsibilities as set out in the Registrar Accreditation Agreement RAA , for posting on Registrar websites. This document also summarizes registrant rights and responsibilities that arise within ICANN Consensus Policies and specifications, as those policies and specifications are incorporated into the RAA. The summarization of terms within this document do not override or replace the terms set forth in the RAA or within those specifications or policy. The RAA sets out various rights and responsibilities for Registrants, and Registrants have additional rights and responsibilities that are set forth in separate ICANN policies and specifications that the Registrars agree to follow. The RAA and the related policies are drafted in very specific, often legal terminology. In order to help Registrants better understand the rights and responsibilities that come along with the registration of a domain name, these rights and responsibilities are being summarized and presented within a single document. The summaries provided here do not override or replace the actual terms as written in the RAA or the related policies and specifications.
Swatch wins Russian domain trial also at Federal Court
оссийский доменный спор закончился победой Swatch и в федеральном окружном суде
The most recent source for. This Tokelau. By applying to register a domain name, or by asking Dot TK to maintain or renew a domain name registration, you hereby represent and warrant to Dot TK that a the statements that you made in your Registration Agreement are complete and accurate; b to your knowledge, the registration of the domain name will not infringe upon or otherwise violate the rights of any third party; c you are not registering the domain name for an unlawful purpose; and d you will not knowingly use the domain name in violation of any applicable laws,or regulations. It is your responsibility to determine whether your domain name registration infringes or violates someone else's rights. Dot TK will cancel, transfer or otherwise make changes to domain name registrations under the following circumstances: a subject to the provisions of Paragraph 8, Dot TK receiving written or appropriate electronic instructions from you or your authorized agent to take such action;. See Paragraph 4 i and k below. This Paragraph sets forth the type of disputes for which you are required to submit to a mandatory administrative proceeding. These proceedings will be conducted before one of the administrative-dispute-resolution service providers listed at a Applicable Disputes. You are required to submit to a mandatory administrative proceeding in the event that a third party a "complainant" asserts to the applicable Provider, in compliance with the Rules of Procedure, that i your domain name is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights; and.
The most recent source for. All domain name holders, registrars and Arnes as the registry are bound by it. This procedure is also quick and inexpensive way of resolving domain name disputes but it does not exclude the possibility of using other legal remedies. In case of a dispute independent arbiters are appointed to deliver a verdict with which Arnes must comply with. When the ADR is started both the complainant and domain holder must follow the proper procedure, use proper forms and mind the terms. We have prepared a graphic illustration of the procedure to offer you some help. Terms used Unless otherwise indicated by the text, the terms used in the ARDS Rules shall have the following meanings:.
In a decision of 23 May , the Federal Arbitrazh Court of the Moscow Circuit confirmed the position previously taken by the Tenth Arbitrazh Appellate Court and by the Court of the Region of Moscow in respect of the domain name swatch. According to the Federal Court, the registrant of swatch. Russian legislation allows owners of well known brands to protect their rights also in the Internet. More and more courts in the Russian Federation agree to this point of view. It is a policy of Swatch not to tolerate cybersquatting of its trademarks and to take legal action against all third parties that infringe Swatch trademarks by using them for domain registrations.